I'm not an "Intelligence analyst" and I don't play one on television. But I urge you to study the following items: 1. Seymour Hersh new piece in The New Yorker, "The Next Act: Is a damaged Administration less likely to attack Iran, or more?" 2. Tony Karon's "Israel's Domestic Political Games Raises the Danger of a U.S.-Iran War." 3. Aluf Benn's "Olmert's Drums of War" in Haaretz . 4. Bush:I would understand if Israel chose to attack Iran. 5. Michael Oren's op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal on November 16 which is only accessible to subscribers. So here are a few interesting quotes: Much like 1967, Israel faces a Middle Eastern leader who has repeatedly sworn to wipe it off the map, and to that end is assiduously trying to acquire nuclear weapons. Like Nasser, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can cripple Israel economically by keeping it in a state of alert, driving away foreign investment and tourism. In the absence of interna...
Comments
The second video here is poorly edited, especially the audio.
Maybe it's not my place, since I'm not exactly familiar with the finer points of video editing myself, but still...
And I could have done without the overdubbed cries and moans over the pictures. The pictures say enough without that junk.
Try to think of this as a Seinfeld episode with Olmert as a recurring character who has to deal with this Nasrallah guy during his day job.
Even though there's only a miniscule chance that he or she actually reads this blog, but still... I should have made that clear.
Speaking of narrative:
"The main subject in the Israeli press is: How could this war have been fought better?
And so it's clear that they didn't achieve what they thought they were going to achieve. And now the question is: Can they create a narrative of victory which will give them a chance to get out?"
-David Brooks
Brooks & Shields, Aug 4. 2006
It seems to this observer that things are just getting started and before things get better, they will get worse and Brooks may have to recalibrate his pitch.