The Choice in November









The look of love
Is in your eyes
The look your smile cant disguise
The look of love
Is saying so much more
Than just words could ever say
And what my heart has heard
Well it takes my breath away
(lyrics by Hal David.

One of these two pro-war candidates. A real "change."

Comments

Anonymous said…
If any well funded Republican could have run a bunch of campaign commercials with that photo, McCain might not have gotten the nomination.


We seen hardly any campaign commericials here in Tennessee this time round'. Money decides who gets elected other than FoxNews et al simply not paying any attention to the other candidtates. We were told it was Guilaini, and then McCain as the frontrunner all along. The hopped on Huck just long enough for Huck to wrest any momentum Thomspon, Romney, or any of the others could have in the religious Iowa.....and then they dumped him.


I'll probably either not vote, or vote Democrat. A vote for McCain rewards the Frums who have been attacking anyone to the right of them, trying to move the party leftward since they were given positions of influence by Buckley (who was one of them at heart in my opinion) since they showed up on the scene in the early nineties. They have to be repudiated or the old Reagan-Dem coalition will fall apart for good and be forgotten.

I think the establishment really wants McCain, and hence why they are trying to assist Obama. They must have some pretty embarrassing stuff on him. A radio talk show host mentioned a gay guy who claims to have done some things other than just cocaine with Obama......there might be more out there like that. I dont believe Fox has been pumping Obama because Murdoch likes the guy. There has got to be something up with that.


It looks like Columbia is giving us a reason to be a "hero" and throw down Chavez. I wonder what we have to do with that behind the scened. AhmadiniNUTJOB is also doing the neo-cons favors. If he was smart, and he's not, he'd shut his mouth, pull a Putin, and continue to build a modern Iranian state with a powerful economy. Nukes can be bought someday and shipped in by a Navy (like the Russian or Chinese Navy) in a way that we couldn't do anything about it without risking a war with THEM. He's an idiot. Iran shouldn't want nukes anyway, they have oil......nobody really wants to destroy someting so precious. Villifying him will be a talking point in McCains campaign, and here he is helping matters. No sense at all.
10:09 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pundits who screw-up: No big deal...

Image
Matt Barganier desconstructs Andrew Sullivan's mea sorta culpa on Iraq in Time magazine (Sullivan seen above in a thoughtful pose on Bill Maher's "Real Time"). There have been many of those in recent weeks (including by WFB and Fukuyama ). In an commentary published last year, Oops! I helped start a War which was about one of the earlier apologizing-war-aplogists, I pointed out to the contrast between the way the losers who operate in the market (including financial analysts) are punished and the reality in which the losers in the political game (including foreign policy analysts) rarely get punished: Imagine: for a few years you were investing the money you had saved for your daughter's college education in one of those moderately conservative plans that provided some increase in the value of the investment without exposing it to major risks. But then your financial planner – let's call him Ken P. – got in touch with you and came up with a really great ide...
Read more

When will Israel attack Iran?

Image
I'm not an "Intelligence analyst" and I don't play one on television. But I urge you to study the following items: 1. Seymour Hersh new piece in The New Yorker, "The Next Act: Is a damaged Administration less likely to attack Iran, or more?" 2. Tony Karon's "Israel's Domestic Political Games Raises the Danger of a U.S.-Iran War." 3. Aluf Benn's "Olmert's Drums of War" in Haaretz . 4. Bush:I would understand if Israel chose to attack Iran. 5. Michael Oren's op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal on November 16 which is only accessible to subscribers. So here are a few interesting quotes: Much like 1967, Israel faces a Middle Eastern leader who has repeatedly sworn to wipe it off the map, and to that end is assiduously trying to acquire nuclear weapons. Like Nasser, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can cripple Israel economically by keeping it in a state of alert, driving away foreign investment and tourism. In the absence of interna...
Read more