I'm not an "Intelligence analyst" and I don't play one on television. But I urge you to study the following items: 1. Seymour Hersh new piece in The New Yorker, "The Next Act: Is a damaged Administration less likely to attack Iran, or more?" 2. Tony Karon's "Israel's Domestic Political Games Raises the Danger of a U.S.-Iran War." 3. Aluf Benn's "Olmert's Drums of War" in Haaretz . 4. Bush:I would understand if Israel chose to attack Iran. 5. Michael Oren's op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal on November 16 which is only accessible to subscribers. So here are a few interesting quotes: Much like 1967, Israel faces a Middle Eastern leader who has repeatedly sworn to wipe it off the map, and to that end is assiduously trying to acquire nuclear weapons. Like Nasser, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can cripple Israel economically by keeping it in a state of alert, driving away foreign investment and tourism. In the absence of interna...
Comments
Perhaps most important for the anti-McCain voter is Obama's likely better chance in the general election.
Geraldine Ferraro said nothing that wasn't obviously true--there's still more resistance to a female candidate generally and Hillary in particular, though Obama's failure to reach working class whites may damn him as well.
McCain must be an unbearable gloating prick right now (when he isn't in congress with fawning members of his press corps--there are more illicit group intimacies going on in the back the Straight Talk Express than aboard a rock band's tour bus).